Retailers The Next Target Of Inflation

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

ELLEN SIMON | July 27, 2008 09:59 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
In this May 8, 2008 file photo, a butcher spreads out rotisserie-roasted chicken at Costco in Mountain View, Calif.. Costco raised its prices for rotisserie chicken from $4.99 to $5.49 about three months ago. Last week, the prices rose to $5.99. The company said it won't swallow price increases from suppliers on key items, but would postpone passing them along to consumers, if only for a few weeks, because it wants to be the last retailer to raise prices. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, file)

NEW YORK — Coming to a store near you: Even higher prices.

Most inflation this year has come from food and fuel, as retailers resisted passing along to strapped consumers the higher prices manufacturers charged them, but coming increases from companies such as Johnson & Johnson and Hasbro Inc. may leave them with no choice.

"While these increases have not for the most part been passed on at the retail level, it is inevitable that they will be at some point," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. "Car dealers and other retailers cannot continue to absorb rising costs at the wholesale level and not pass some of these increases on to consumers."

Sherwin Williams Co. on July 17 announced its third price increase in eight months. The company has been having "difficult discussions" with retailers, Chris Connor, chairman and CEO, said on its quarterly conference call.

The price increases are "well supported with facts in terms of why the company needs them," he said. "Our customers, to the best of their ability, are passing them on."

Hasbro said the retailers it sells to didn't like price increases the company announced Monday "but they recognize that their own private-label costs are going up and they've accepted it."

The increases leave retailers in a bind: They can keep prices steady and cut profit margins or raise prices and risk losing sales.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has been in the lead of aggressively keeping prices down, pressuring its competitors to do the same.

Story continues below
advertisement

"We have seen inflation and we have passed some of that through," said John Simley, a Wal-Mart spokesman. "We have, wherever possible, worked with our suppliers to reduce the inflationary impact as much as possible."

Costco Wholesale Corp. said Wednesday its fourth-quarter earnings would be "well-below" Wall Street estimates of $1 a share as it delays price increases. Stock in rival BJ's Wholesale Club Inc. fell more than 10 percent as investors feared the competitor would have to match Costco's prices.

Some economists say that once Americans spend their $106.7 billion in tax rebate checks, consumer spending may shrivel, sparking a round of price cuts to entice shoppers. Others think price increases may be postponed, but they're on their way.

Much of this depends on how much money consumers have after buying gas and groceries _ and what kind of mood they're in once they've filled their tanks. On Friday, The Reuters/University of Michigan index of consumer sentiment for July came in at 61.2, beating expectations and slightly better than the 28-year low of 56.4 hit in June. Still, the confidence index was at 90.4 a year ago.

Even Costco said it won't swallow price increases from suppliers on key items, but would postpone passing them along to consumers, if only for a few weeks, because it wants to be the last retailer to raise prices.

The company raised its prices for rotisserie chicken from $4.99 to $5.49 about three months ago. Last week, the prices rose to $5.99.

"I think the consumer is just starting to see, not only with us, rising commodity costs and rising general merchandise costs in a much bigger way then they've seen other than with gasoline itself," said Richard Galanti, Costco's chief financial officer, during a conference call Wednesday.

Inflation hit 5 percent for the year in June, the highest it's been since 1991, but the price increases hitting manufacturers have been far worse.

Prices manufacturers paid for crude materials rose 70 percent for the three months ended in June, but companies weren't able to pass all those increases along. Prices for the intermediate goods made from those materials rose much less, about 27 percent. The prices for finished products made from those goods rose 14 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index.

Kimberly-Clark Corp., which makes Kleenex, Huggies diapers and Viva paper towels, said Thursday that energy and commodity cost increases this year would total as much as $900 million, double its prediction at the beginning of the year.

Saying the company might raise prices for the second time this year, Chief Executive Thomas Falk added, "The reality is that the rapid run-up in commodity costs has outpaced our ability to offset inflation in the near-term with price increases and other actions."

The increases keep coming.

Dow Chemical Co., the second largest chemical company in the world after Germany's BASF, is raising some prices by as much as 25 percent this month, following June price increases that were as high as 20 percent on all products. The increase is sure to put more pressure on manufacturers, since Dow's chemicals are used in everything from packing peanuts to frozen-food trays to diapers.

_

Associated Press Business Writer Anne D'Innocenzio contributed to this report. Ellen Simon covers the economy. She can be reached at esimon(at)ap.org.

NEW YORK — Coming to a store near you: Even higher prices. Most inflation this year has come from food and fuel, as retailers resisted passing along to strapped consumers the higher prices manu...
NEW YORK — Coming to a store near you: Even higher prices. Most inflation this year has come from food and fuel, as retailers resisted passing along to strapped consumers the higher prices manu...
 
 

Comments
935
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- KOisGod See Profile I'm a Fan of KOisGod permalink

No prob!

My employer is generously giving everyone a 10% raise next quarter.

How about yours?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 07/28/2008
- speakingtruth2power See Profile I'm a Fan of speakingtruth2power permalink


Those who argue that this economic catastrophe on the way

is not intended, are the same 'denialist' frogs who will deny

that the water in the pot is not getting hotter. Learn from what

has happened before and who the FED really is. The FED is

a group of internationalists (and often Zionists) who through

manipulation, own more of US each time we go through an

economic upheaval that they have helped create.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 07/28/2008
- emstrem See Profile I'm a Fan of emstrem permalink

I hope all the "do-gooder" raise fuel prices people are happy. This is after all what you get when the whole country relies on trucking to move merchandise, but maybe the "do-gooders" didnt look that far ahead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 07/28/2008
- 23000Days See Profile I'm a Fan of 23000Days permalink

Or maybe the "do-gooders" realize that rectifying this miserable state of affairs will take pain and sacrifice. The good news is it's working;
private investment in alternative energy has soared, even as the market has tumbled.
Americans drove 30 billion miles less thru june of this year.
People are actually asking themselves whether they really need that piece of plastic junk, or three cars in hte driveway.
Public transportation is suddenly swamped wit riders.
The suburbs are becoming a real luxury for those working in the city.

These are but a few of the needed changes the "do-gooders" foresaw, and lookit that; it's working!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 07/28/2008
- fredamae See Profile I'm a Fan of fredamae permalink

they Have been on the rise, are on the rise and to try and "soften" the "consumer anticipated" additional increase is, well, sorta dumb, really.

Consumers know first hand what the "news" is re: This subject matter.

Just don't buy it if you don't Seriously Need it. Who says one "has" to be in Vogue? Who say a still functioning BBQ, Patio Set, Shoes, Clothes, Drapes etc Must be "updated" for a "new look"? Retailer's who wish to sell to you, "material things" , thats who.

Shopping is highly over rated and the contest should be "who can last the longest w/out buying new".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 07/28/2008
- Chavez08 See Profile I'm a Fan of Chavez08 permalink

Is Capitalism Slavery?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 07/28/2008
- separatingwheatfromchaff See Profile I'm a Fan of separatingwheatfromchaff permalink

"Retailers The Next Target Of Inflation".I don't know about everyone else but I've been looking at prices rise for quite a while,and not just by a little bit.We all know who's going to foot the bill in the end.For publicly traded companies it's just a matter of how to do it with the least loss of customers.For private retailers,they have families and bills too.I suppose it's all for the good though since we all knew we were going to pay for this war somehow.Next time the SCOTUS appoints a President maybe people will take to the streets and make sure the votes are counted.The free ride is over and the villains are leaving town with their plunder.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 07/28/2008
- LittleSanityLeft See Profile I'm a Fan of LittleSanityLeft permalink

"Car dealers and other retailers cannot continue to absorb rising costs at the wholesale level and not pass some of these increases on to consumers."

You mean try to pass it on to consumers. If people can't afford to pay they're not going to pay. Raising prices in the middle of a recession--psychological or not--won't equal increased profits but will most certainly scare off consumers.

The only ones to win from increased prices for consumers is Walmart, everyone will gravitate to Walmart to help balance their budgets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 AM on 07/28/2008
- AlteSoldier See Profile I'm a Fan of AlteSoldier permalink

The Tax Policy Center prepared an interesting report (pdf) this week, noting the key differences between the economic policies articulated by John McCain and the economic policies presented by John McCain"s presidential campaign.

There"s a bit of a gap " to the tune of $2.8 trillion (that"s "trillion," with a "t").

According to the study, the tax plan McCain"s campaign laid out privately is different from the one he"s selling on the stump. If you include the policies he has advocated publicly"such as repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax, increasing the dependent exemption to $7,000 right away, and reducing the corporate tax rate to 25 percent immediately"then the deficit after 10 years would actually be $2.8 trillion greater than if you go by his private plan. There"s also a rhetorical gap for Obama, but in his case the public version generates more revenue than the private one, thanks to a suggested hike in payroll taxes for people who make $250,000 or more.

How does the McCain campaign respond to this? As it turns out, hilariously.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, McCain"s chief economic adviser, told Slate, "[McCain] has certainly I"m sure said things in town halls" that don"t jibe perfectly with his written plan. But that doesn"t mean it"s official."

Got that? If we want to better understand John McCain"s economic policies, we should overlook what John McCain says about his economic policies. McCain"s "official" positions don"t come from McCain.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/16342.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 AM on 07/28/2008
- DrDemon See Profile I'm a Fan of DrDemon permalink

YAH!

Yesterday, I bought a gallon of milk, a loaf of bread and a snack cake and it cost me $10.63.

Lately, everything has a 9*0*2*1*0 cost to it.

W T F - Chuck!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 AM on 07/28/2008
- starboymikey See Profile I'm a Fan of starboymikey permalink

Yesterday, I bought a gallon of milk, a loaf of bread and a snack cake and it cost me $10.63.
___________________________________________________________________

Cut out the snack cake. It's just empty calories anyway and you'll be able to afford the bread and milk.
And don't forget what old Ronald Reagan said about school lunches: ketchup counts as a vegetable.

Happy feasting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 07/28/2008
- DrDemon See Profile I'm a Fan of DrDemon permalink

Well, I ended up putting the bread & milk back and kept the cake... I saved $8.50

I'm not 2pid or ignant... just a saver!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 07/28/2008
- EricSaeger See Profile I'm a Fan of EricSaeger permalink

Might want to cut out the bread, too, because of all the sugar in it. And milk has all those nutty steroids.
I just eat relish now. Cains brand, so I can feel snobby.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 07/28/2008
- samej82 See Profile I'm a Fan of samej82 permalink

Let's get back to Gold...
Why don't we start a discussion about it? I know the talking heads on TV love discuss things. Greenspan set it up so we can get back on the plan. It'll benefit all of the world if we do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 07/28/2008
- Rog49Thomas See Profile I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas permalink

The Gold Standard is not a panacea for economic problems.

it is a mechanism to enforce discipline which transmits the incentive for change (or "punishment") onto debtors in periods of falling prices and creditors in times of rising prices.

Lawrence Goodwyn's "The Populist Moment". shows how the return to the gold standard after the Civil War created great suffering in the South and Midwest and almost led to a fundamental political realignment in the USA.

At its heart the central questions in the debate over which economic policies should be adopted are (a) whether an economy reaches a static equilibrium between supply and demand factors
(b) whether the equilibrium reached is always the "full" employment point

A secondary problem is mathematical. To solve a series of equations (a model of the economy) one needs to have one more equation than the number of variables (e.g., 6 equations and 5 or less variables). Models developed to date do not have this characteristic so economists "plug" one variable as unchangeable (the favorite two are either prices or employment). As you'd expect you get different "solutions" depending on which variable you hold constant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 07/28/2008
- WorkingClass See Profile I'm a Fan of WorkingClass permalink

If you just got here, don't bother with this thread. It sux.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 07/27/2008
- scottarino See Profile I'm a Fan of scottarino permalink

zzziiiinnng!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 AM on 07/28/2008
- zippywpinhead See Profile I'm a Fan of zippywpinhead permalink

it was fine until you showed up...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 07/28/2008
- helonias See Profile I'm a Fan of helonias permalink

Gee I wish I had 7 homes, a private jet a spouse worth $100 mil, a Navy pension and disability and SS and a Senate salary and the best Gov social health care.

I wish.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 07/27/2008
- starboymikey See Profile I'm a Fan of starboymikey permalink

Gee I wish I had 7 homes, a private jet a spouse worth $100 mil, a Navy pension and disability and SS and a Senate salary and the best Gov social health care.
___________________________________________________

Make our congreemen and senators accept the same health care most of us have (or don't) and you'll see change real fast.

Also, why the hell do they get to vote themselves raises each year. They are our employees. Who the hell of employees being able to vote themselves raises?

We should have yearly public debate and vote on just how big (if any) a raise congress deserves. We should also be able to cut their pay, adust their benefits and lay them off during recession.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 07/28/2008
- 23000Days See Profile I'm a Fan of 23000Days permalink

Actually it's worse than you fear. Congress has it set up to get automatic raises annually, unless they vote against it each year!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 07/28/2008
- DrDemon See Profile I'm a Fan of DrDemon permalink

Never envy... what would you do with all that if it meant that a serious illness was included (GOD forbid)

Stick with what you have...

"what we may sometimes envision as good or great; may create hate or bad fate"

--DrDemon - 2008

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 AM on 07/28/2008
- helonias See Profile I'm a Fan of helonias permalink

I would be happy with only decent health care

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 07/28/2008
- Rog49Thomas See Profile I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas permalink

If you read closely through these posts there is a common thread.

"I can't make ends meet". "I can't feed my family" "I can't afford health care". "It costs too much to fill up my car". "I don't think I can send my kids to college now".

Me, me, me, me. Pure seflfishness.

By contrast when say a guy like David Lesar goes before Congress he points out how a wise move (say an unneeded tax cut for the already too wealthy or some form of government handout for a rich corporation) will make America a better place.
Not a word from him about the hard personal decisions he faces in his life. Not a single complaint about the bill to "tank up" his Learjet. Not one!

For guys like him it's all about America.

And don't forget these are the guys who create all those McJobs (many in India an elsewhere overseas) so that Americans like you can afford to shop at Target and Wal-Mart (well maybe the $1 Store now).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 07/27/2008
- whatsthatsound See Profile I'm a Fan of whatsthatsound permalink

Nation of whiners, man. Psychological recession. People don't know how good they got it.
Besides, high food and gas prices are a good thing for an overweight, and under-mobile, populace. A year from now, when we won't be able to stop looking at our toned, taut behinds in the mirror, we'll realize what a bunch of crybabies we were.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 AM on 07/28/2008
- 23000Days See Profile I'm a Fan of 23000Days permalink

Bad start, but good points!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 07/28/2008
- Anciano See Profile I'm a Fan of Anciano permalink

You can't spend 10 billion dollars a week of borrowed money and not have inflation. Thanks Republicans. All you people whining about inflation, remember McCain's campaign chair Phil Gramm's admonition: "Stop whining--this is a mental recession."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 07/27/2008
- ChiGuy See Profile I'm a Fan of ChiGuy permalink

Geez.
Will this give the Tinfoil Hat Brigade fuel to call for the mass stocking of essentials?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 07/27/2008
- Rog49Thomas See Profile I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas permalink

Given the move in commodity prices, aluminum foil may be a wise investment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 07/28/2008
- WLA See Profile I'm a Fan of WLA permalink

Already has. A few pages back. Lolz.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 07/27/2008